Investigation of the Governance Structure of the Nairobi Dairy Value Chain and its Influence on Food Safety.

Jonathan Rushton of the Global Burden of Animal Diseases project has collaborated with Stella Kiambi (Food and Agriculture Organization), Joshua Orungo Onono, Erastus Keng’ethe, Gabriel O,Aboge (University of Nairobi), Patrick Muinde, James Akoko, Kelvin Momanyi, (International Livestock Research Institute), Eric M. Fevre (University of Liverpool and International Livestock Research Institute) and Pablo Alarcon (Royal Veterinary College, London) to produce the now published article Investigation of the governance structure of the Nairobi dairy value chain and its influence on food safety.

The dairy value chain of Nairobi is comprised, in its majority, of small-scale independent enterprises that operate within a complex interlinked system. In this complexity, the coordination and power structures of the system may have major influences on the management of dairy food safety. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the governance structure and challenges faced by stakeholders throughout the Nairobi dairy value chain and assess their potential implications on food safety. Qualitative data were collected through focus group discussions and key informant interviews based on a dairy value chain mapping framework previously developed. Thematic analysis enabled identification of governance themes, key challenges and analysis of their implications on food safety. Themes were organized depending on their association with farmers (informal settlement or peri-urban), dairy cooperatives, dairy traders, processing companies, retailers or government officers. The identified governance themes included: i) weak linkage between government and farmers, ii) inadequate compliance with government regulations by traders and retailers, iii) emphasis on business licenses and permits for revenue rather than for food safety, iv) multiple licensing resulting in high business cost and lack of compliance, v) fragmented regulation, vi) unfair competition and vii) sanctions that do not always result in compliance. The key challenges identified included, among others: i) inadequate farmer support, ii) harassment of traders and retailers and iii) high business costs for traders, retailers, dairy cooperatives and large processors. The implication of governance and challenges of food safety were, among others: i) inadequate extension services, ii) insufficient cold chain, iii) delivery of adulterated and low milk quality to bulking centers, iv) inadequate food safety training and v) lack of policies for management of waste milk. The range of issues highlighted are based on stakeholders’ perceptions and reflects the complexity of the relationships between them. Many of the governance themes demonstrate the linkages that are both beneficial or confrontational between the formal and informal sectors, and between industry and regulatory authorities, with possible direct food safety consequences. Findings obtained provide indications to decision-makers of potential governance areas that could help improve efficiency and food safety along the dairy value chain.

This article is available on Elsevier (Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume 179, June 2020 – 105009)